{"id":12210,"date":"2019-09-10T11:34:57","date_gmt":"2019-09-10T09:34:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dhd-blog.org\/?p=12210"},"modified":"2020-07-22T14:16:35","modified_gmt":"2020-07-22T12:16:35","slug":"ride-preis-fuer-die-beste-rezension-in-band-10","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dhd-blog.org\/?p=12210","title":{"rendered":"RIDE-Preis f\u00fcr die beste Rezension in Band 10"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p> Das Institut f\u00fcr Dokumentologie und Editorik (IDE) freut sich, den Gewinner des f\u00fcnften RIDE-Preises f\u00fcr die beste Rezension in \u201eRIDE 10 \u2013  Digital Scholarly Editions of Correspondence\u201c bekannt zu geben (<a href=\"http:\/\/ride.i-d-e.de\/issues\/issue-9\/\">http:\/\/ride.i-d-e.de\/issue-10\/<\/a>).  Der Preis in H\u00f6he von 250 Euro wird mit gro\u00dfz\u00fcgiger Unterst\u00fctzung der  geisteswissenschaftlichen Fakult\u00e4t der Universit\u00e4t Graz vergeben (mehr  Informationen: <a href=\"http:\/\/ride.i-d-e.de\/reviewers\/ride-award-for-best-review\/\">http:\/\/ride.i-d-e.de\/reviewers\/ride-award-for-best-review\/<\/a>). <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Die Jury der Preisvergabe, bestehend aus  Thomas St\u00e4cker (Universit\u00e4ts- und Landesbibliothek Darmstadt), Roman Bleier (Universit\u00e4t Graz), Frederike Neuber und Markus Schn\u00f6pf (beide Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften)  \u2013  verleiht  den Preis diesmal an  <br>Dominik Kasper (Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur Mainz) f\u00fcr sein Review der \u201eAlfred Escher-Briefedition\u201c (<a href=\"https:\/\/ride.i-d-e.de\/issues\/issue-10\/alfred-escher-briefedition\/\">https:\/\/ride.i-d-e.de\/issues\/issue-10\/alfred-escher-briefedition\/<\/a>).*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Begr\u00fcndung:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>The excellent review by Dominik Kasper provides a detailed overview of the \u201eAlfred Escher-Briefedition\u201d (Alfred Escher edition of correspondence) by taking into account the context of its creation and the edited materials as well as its technical implementation and web presentation.  The reviewer\u2019s discussion of digital methods used in the edition illustrates their application by means of concrete examples, which makes his assessment of the edition very comprehensible for the reader. Even if the review is mostly positive, the reviewer also expresses necessary criticism, such as the deviation from the TEI standard and missing API and download options. By expressing suggestions for improvement at the same time, the review opens up a constructive discussion that is very valuable both for the \u201eAlfred Escher-Briefedition\u201d as well as for other digital editions of correspondence.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>* Das Review von Ulrike Henny-Krahmer wurde bei der Preisvergabe nicht ber\u00fccksichtigt, da die Rezensentin Mit-Herausgeberin von RIDE ist.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Das Institut f\u00fcr Dokumentologie und Editorik (IDE) freut sich, den Gewinner des f\u00fcnften RIDE-Preises f\u00fcr die beste Rezension in \u201eRIDE 10 \u2013 Digital Scholarly Editions of Correspondence\u201c bekannt zu geben (http:\/\/ride.i-d-e.de\/issue-10\/). Der Preis in H\u00f6he von 250 Euro wird mit gro\u00dfz\u00fcgiger Unterst\u00fctzung der geisteswissenschaftlichen Fakult\u00e4t der Universit\u00e4t Graz vergeben (mehr Informationen: http:\/\/ride.i-d-e.de\/reviewers\/ride-award-for-best-review\/). Die Jury der [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":174,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,103,11,10],"tags":[490,428,780],"class_list":["post-12210","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein","category-community","category-forschung","category-reflektion","tag-ide","tag-rezension","tag-ride"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dhd-blog.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12210","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dhd-blog.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dhd-blog.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dhd-blog.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/174"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dhd-blog.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=12210"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/dhd-blog.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12210\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14130,"href":"https:\/\/dhd-blog.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12210\/revisions\/14130"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dhd-blog.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=12210"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dhd-blog.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=12210"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dhd-blog.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=12210"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}